trenchless-technology-article-2026
On legacy transit corridors, some of the most significant project risks are hidden underground. Unknown utilities, abandoned trenches, undocumented infrastructure, and legacy construction can influence design decisions, budgets, schedules, safety, and stakeholder confidence. By integrating Utility Coordination with MCGPR-enhanced Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE), project teams can develop a clearer understanding of subsurface conditions early, while there is still flexibility to make informed design decisions.
On the Dundas BRT corridor, this approach identified more than 900 linear features, 140 anomalous zones, and 54 utility trenches. The additional insight allowed investigations to be prioritized more strategically, helping reduce planned test holes by approximately 50% while maintaining confidence in design decisions. The project demonstrates how better subsurface information can reduce uncertainty, minimize disruption, and make more effective use of project resources.
pauls-corner-history-of-subsurface-utility-engineering

No worries here about damaging underground utilities! Right? Wouldn't it be nice if we could all say yes? Many project owners can, but many cannot.

Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) has become an essential component of modern infrastructure planning, risk management, and design. As cities grow and underground networks become increasingly congested, the need for accurate utility locating and mapping has never been greater. Without proper underground utility management, construction projects can face costly delays, safety hazards, and legal liabilities. SUE provides engineers, planners, and contractors with reliable data to make informed decisions before breaking ground, ensuring that utility conflicts are minimized, and project timelines are maintained. By combining geophysical methods, vacuum excavation, and rigorous documentation, SUE bridges the gap between traditional civil engineering design and real-world underground conditions.

The origins of SUE trace back to a small group of innovators whose ideas and determination transformed scattered techniques into a disciplined engineering practice. This article brings together the early history of SUE through the experiences and reflections of Paul Scott, a former Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and civil engineer, who witnessed its emergence firsthand in the early 1990s. He offers a uniquely personal account of the people and moments that defined the foundation of SUE.

Henry “Garon” Stutzman: The Innovator Behind Subsurface Utility Engineering

The person most widely recognized as the “inventor” of Subsurface Utility Engineering is Henry “Garon” Stutzman. In the 1970s, Garon worked as a relocation engineer for Washington Gas Light (WGL) in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.

Garon grew increasingly convinced that the traditional methods of dealing with utilities were wasting the money of the ratepayer and taxpayer. He was aware of the advantages of air/vacuum systems for safe excavation and the exposure of gas systems for anode emplacement. The spark of the idea that this safe excavation method could be used to gather data on the exact location of a utility during the design stage, coupled with his great energy, caused him to leave WGL in 1981 and form So-Deep, Inc.

By the time Paul Scott met Garon in 1991, he was already an accomplished award-winning entrepreneur and businessman. He was known for surrounding himself with very good people and allowing them to do their work without interference, while simultaneously demanding excellence from all who worked for him regardless of the cost.

One memorable example of his generosity came when he invited Paul and his family to his farm in The Plains for a day of mule racing, a personal hobby. He had invited other people as well, neighbors, co-workers, and friends, and it turned out to be a fabulous afternoon. This openness and energy reflected the same qualities that allowed him to conceptualize and launch SUE as a new way of thinking about underground utilities.

James H. Anspach: The Father of Subsurface Utility Engineering

If Stutzman provided the spark for SUE, James H. Anspach provided the structure. Widely regarded as the “father” of Subsurface Utility Engineering, Anspach was one of the first people Stutzman hired at So-Deep. A geophysicist at Penn State specializing in civil applications, he brought the rigor, analytical mindset, and field experience that helped transform Stutzman’s ideas into a consistent engineering methodology.

In the early 1980s, locating underground utilities with precision, particularly non-conductive water and gas lines, was extremely challenging in Washington’s congested, aging underground environment. Multiple utilities were often closely clustered, and conventional methods struggled to provide the accuracy designers needed.

Stutzman had attended several of Anspach’s classes on utility locating, and their shared interest led to a pivotal agreement in 1983 between So-Deep and Media General. The partnership authorized So-Deep to use surface geophysics to identify subsurface utilities ahead of construction and pair these methods with air/vacuum excavation for cable road bores.

Anspach left Penn State to manage that work, ultimately staying at So-Deep for many years and shaping the foundations of what SUE would become. His contributions extend through decades of development and standardization. Most notably, he served as the primary author of the ASCE 38-22 Standard Guideline for Investigating and Documenting Existing Utilities, the definitive standard for utility investigation practices today.

A Close Working Relationship and the Many Lessons Learned

During the 1990s, Paul Scott had the opportunity to work closely with Jim Anspach. One time, Jim invited Paul to attend a presentation with him in Olympia, Washington. He suggested that Paul fly into Portland, Oregon, where Jim would meet him and take him to his home in the nearby mountains. Jim picked Paul up at the airport in a sporty convertible, and together they drove to his mountain house with the top down.

Upon arrival, they were warmly welcomed by Jim’s wife, Laura. The house was impressive, surrounded almost entirely by national forest, and had been designed by Jim himself with open spaces and expansive windows. During the visit, Jim showed Paul his collection of crystals, the barn where Laura kept her horses, and a government-controlled irrigation ditch that crossed the property.

That evening, Laura prepared a lovely dinner. Later, they climbed a set of stairs to a rooftop platform, where they watched the stars as Jim pointed them out by name. The following morning, they traveled to Olympia in Jim’s convertible, this time with the top up due to the cold, while Jim shared a geological history of the surrounding mountain rocks. The entire experience was all pretty awesome.

No matter how many times he heard Jim speak on the same topic, Paul learned something new every time. Jim’s thinking was fast and deep; whenever Paul grasped one concept, he would already be exploring the next. Those years became an invaluable education

SUE: More Than Locators and Vacuum Trucks

Modern Subsurface Utility Engineering relies on a combination of advanced tools and methodologies. Vacuum excavation allows crews to expose underground utilities safely, minimizing the risk of damage and injury. Surface geophysics, including electromagnetic and ground-penetrating radar (GPR), enables engineers to detect non-conductive utilities like water and gas lines that traditional locators might miss. These techniques feed into utility mapping systems that provide planners and contractors with detailed, accurate data. By integrating these practices into project workflows, SUE professionals reduce uncertainty, improve design decisions, and prevent costly construction delays, core principles that have guided the industry since its inception.

Even before SUE had an official name, both Garon Stutzman and Jim Anspach had already expanded it far beyond basic locating practices. By the late 1980s and early 1990s, SUE had evolved into a multidisciplinary, risk-reducing, accuracy-focused engineering process.

Many people still view SUE as simply a combination of pipe and cable locating and vacuum excavation. However, its pioneers understood, long before the industry did, that SUE was something much deeper:

  • A method for reducing construction risk
  • A way to improve design decisions
  • A commitment to accurate documentation and quality control
  • A systematic process to prevent utility damage before construction ever begins

One of the most significant legacies of early SUE pioneers is the formalization of standards for underground utility investigation. Jim Anspach played a leading role in drafting the ASCE 38-22 standard. This standard provides a clear framework for classifying utility data by quality and confidence, helping engineers, designers, and contractors make informed decisions. Today, SUE is not only about locating utilities; it encompasses comprehensive underground utility management, risk reduction, and documentation practices that are critical for successful infrastructure projects worldwide.

The Legacy of Subsurface Utility Engineering in Modern Infrastructure

While not every project owner today can say they're confident that there is reduced risk of damaging underground utilities, many can, and that number continues to grow thanks to the efforts of these early SUE innovators.

The legacy of Subsurface Utility Engineering continues to grow. Today, advances in digital utility mapping, 3D modeling, and real-time data collection have expanded SUE’s capabilities far beyond its origins. Yet the foundational principles established by Garon Stutzman and Jim Anspach, accuracy, risk reduction, and systematic investigation, remain as relevant as ever. As infrastructure planning and underground utility management become increasingly complex, the early lessons of SUE continue to guide engineers and project owners toward safer, more efficient, and more cost-effective outcomes.

The history of Subsurface Utility Engineering is far from finished, but understanding where it began and who built it helps highlight the remarkable progress the industry has achieved.

How can we help?

Contact 4Sight Utility Engineers today to learn how our expert team can provide precise utility locating, advanced utility mapping, and comprehensive underground utility management for your next project.

Posted in NPC
4sight-blue-jays-game-2026

4Sight had a great time at the Blue Jays game last week. It’s always lots of fun to bring the team together with friends and family, and even better to see our name on the big screen and watch the Jays come away with a win!

pauls-corner-early-adoption-of-subsurface-utility-engineering

Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) did not gain recognition through theory alone. Its early acceptance came from demonstration on active projects where inaccurate utility information had already created risk. In the early 1980s, several important events took place that began to show that a disciplined approach to underground utility investigation could change how infrastructure projects were planned and delivered. These early efforts moved SUE from a developing idea into a service that public agencies could evaluate, adopt, and rely on.

Early Contracts That Established a New Service Model

Following early project success, public agencies began to formalize how utility investigation services were procured.

In 1982, the County of Fairfax, Virginia, entered into a contract with So-Deep for locating (test holes). This was the first instance of a governmental body entering into a task-order basis contract for locating utilities. The County of Arlington, Virginia, soon followed. In 1983, as discussed previously, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) entered into a contract for designating (geophysical methods) and locating (test holes) utilities on a highway project, and in 1985, VDOT initiated a statewide contract with So-Deep for designating and locating work, the first such contract in the nation.

It was found early on that the utility companies had very poor records on the locations of their subsurface facilities and consequently the one-call markings were often inaccurate or missing.  Jim Anspach was quoted at the time as saying:

“We were determined to get good utility information in spite of not having utility records that were accurate and reliable; we repurposed geophysical technology, searched the world for new equipment, and replaced ‘pipe witching’ with science and limited utility exposure.”

 

The First Major Case Study That Demonstrated Measurable Value

Jim Anspach documented a case study in his history of SUE that was probably the first BIG case study showing the value of SUE. It goes like this:

Garon Stutzman approached the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) in late 1983 with the concept of designating all the utilities on a highway project in the design stage so that designers could avoid them on paper when possible. VDOT saw the potential and allocated $10,000 for a trial project. The selected project was a massive road reconstruction in Crystal City (VA) traversing the Pentagon and National Airport areas. Construction plans were already drawn, with utilities plotted from owner records and supposedly “certified” as correct by the utility companies. So-Deep designated the utilities and a VDOT crew surveyed the designations and plotted them on the plans. There were vast differences. So-Deep then performed approximately 100 test holes to prove their designations were accurate and to further identify the potential conflicts. On the record, VDOT stated to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that over $1 million dollars in savings to the tax payer were realized. Off the record, the figure was $7 million or more.

Post 4 - Early Subsurface Utiltiy Engineer Technician

This project established a clear outcome: investing in accurate utility information before construction could prevent cost escalation and schedule disruption.

Defining Designating and Locating as Separate Functions

At some point, questions arose regarding what to call the services that So-Deep was providing. Jim Anspach and Jeff Oakley, a Penn State physics graduate, did some brainstorming and developed the terms “designating” and “locating” to more accurately differentiate these functions. They rationalized that a utility was not located until it was exposed; until then, their existence and approximate location were designated by interpreting an energy field of some kind.

Building Quality Through In-House Survey Control

Locating 1980

As demand grew, maintaining consistency in deliverables became increasingly important. Accurate field data needed to be translated into reliable drawings that designers could use with confidence.

At the request of VDOT, So-Deep hired an experienced land surveyor (Mike Fisher) to develop its own survey capability and to manage the first VDOT contract.  Whereas many future providers subcontracted the survey work to local companies, having its own in-house survey unit provided So-Deep with better control over the quality of the work and was a differentiator in later years when competing with other providers.

The Shift Toward Recognized Professional Practice

Maryland’s Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC) entered into a contract with So-Deep in the mid-1980s to provide designating and locating services. Maryland statutes dictated that any information depicted on plans through survey work associated with these services, when used by a public agency, must be “sealed” by a registered professional. As a result, So-Deep added a professional engineer (Lou Ostendorff) to seal their deliverables to clients. This was the first time any portion of the designating and/or locating work was required to be endorsed by a registered professional. This requirement set the stage for future development of SUE as a professional service rather than a contractor service.

Professional Liability and the Recognition of Risk

As SUE projects increased in scale, the associated risks extended beyond physical damage during construction. Securing professional liability insurance for this work proved difficult. Jim Anspach gave his insights to Paul:

"It was virtually impossible for So-Deep to remain self-insured when performing millions of dollars’ worth of what had been ruled professional services, and professional liability insurance proved difficult to get when one was doing what had never been done before. No insurance company was willing to take on the 'designating' aspect of SUE, just the traditional survey of the designating. So-Deep even went to Lloyds of London to make the attempt. Finally, CNA insurance stepped up and stated that if So-Deep was willing to pay for one of CNA’s executives to observe every aspect of field and office operations for a period of time (it lasted more than a month) and if So-Deep’s designating services were deemed “insurable” after that evaluation, CNA would offer professional liability insurance for the entire package of what So-Deep was offering. Thus, in 1988, CNA insurance company issued a professional liability policy to So-Deep that covered all aspects of its operation, not just the survey aspects. This was the culmination of years of effort by So-Deep’s General Counsel, Harley A.J. “Bucky” Methfessel. By having this insurance, So-Deep was able to cover negligent errors or omissions in their services that could result in project delay claims, redesign costs, extra work order claims…more than just covering the cost of repairs if a utility was damaged during construction. Years of successful operations without claims from So-Deep set the stage for other insurance companies to provide similar coverage to the newer SUE firms that in a few years would be entering the market.”

 

The Ongoing Impact on Infrastructure Projects

The practices introduced during this period continue to influence how infrastructure projects are delivered. Early efforts to improve utility data quality have evolved into comprehensive approaches that integrate field investigation with design and construction planning.

The emphasis on accuracy, documentation, and risk management remains central to SUE. These principles guide how project teams reduce uncertainty and avoid disruption.

Understanding how these methods developed provides context for current expectations. The systems used today are built on the lessons learned during these early projects, where each advancement addressed a specific gap in how underground utilities were managed.

How can we help?

4Sight Utility Engineers supports clients with precise utility locating, advanced mapping, and structured investigation processes. Our team delivers the clarity needed to move projects forward with confidence

Posted in NPC
Manuel Gagnon

4Sight Utility Engineers are excited to welcome Manuel Gagnon, who is joining our Utility Design team as a Senior Designer.

Manny brings more than six years of experience delivering municipal and private sector street lighting, hydro distribution, and electrical infrastructure designs throughout Toronto and the GTA, including work on major infrastructure and transit initiatives.

We're especially excited because Manny is our third utility design team member to join us in as many months. This is a real reflection of the continued growth of our team and the increasing demand for the services 4Sight provide.

Together with Anthony Iozzo, MBA and Michael Gentile, P.Eng, PMP®, Manny will help us to continue delivering practical, reliable solutions for our clients and partners.

Welcome to the team!

right-of-way-conference-2026

We're excited to be back at the ROW Management Conference for another great year. Join Lawrence Arcand for his presentation, "Who Owns Utility Risk? The Role of the PUE," and be sure to stop by Booth 8 to connect with our team.

- October 14–15, 2026
- Deer Creek Golf & Banquet Facility, Ajax, Ontario

https://rowmanagement.ca/

how-sue-got-its-name-pauls-corner

By the late 1980s, Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) had already begun demonstrating its value on transportation projects. The work of pioneers such as Henry “Garon” Stutzman and James H. Anspach had helped establish the technical foundations of the practice, while early projects showed that addressing utility conflicts during design could produce significant savings and reduce construction risk.

At the same time, another series of events was unfolding within the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Those events would eventually help carry SUE from a developing practice used by a handful of agencies to a concept recognized throughout the transportation industry.

How Subsurface Utility Engineering Got Its Name

At Garon's company, So-Deep, the senior management team realized that their creation needed a distinctive name. Jim Anspach remembers that: “After much debate, we decided that ‘Subsurface Utility Engineering’ was apt and descriptive. This name was presented to the world in 1989 at the first National Highway/Utility Conference in Cleveland, Ohio.”

When the Federal Highway Administration’s promotion of SUE began in 1991, it was determined by leaders in the Office of Engineering that Subsurface Utility Engineering and SUE were apt names for this engineering practice. They particularly liked “Engineering” in the name and from the very beginning considered Subsurface Utility Engineering to be a professional engineering practice.

Even though Subsurface Utility Engineering was considered to be a perfect name, there was a time when the term “SUE” was in jeopardy. It culminated one day when the FHWA’s Office of Public Affairs was making a video for in-house distribution about Subsurface Utility Engineering. A young woman with much marketing experience and public relations expertise was in charge of the project.

At some point Paul Scott told her that he wasn’t sure if SUE was an appropriate name for an engineering practice. She vehemently disagreed. She said that SUE was a catchy name, whereas Subsurface Utility Engineering was a mouthful, and she strongly recommended that we keep it and use it. The name stayed. It went into the video and everything else after that. And she was so right.

A Hurricane Changes the Course of Events

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) began endorsing Subsurface Utility Engineering in 1991. It all began, however, in 1989 at about the same time as SUE was getting its name. The story begins with a hurricane.

Hurricane Hugo slammed into the United States near Sullivan’s Island in South Carolina at about midnight on September 22, 1989. It was one of the strongest hurricanes in South Carolina’s history, and at the time the costliest hurricane ever in the Atlantic Ocean. Hugo’s destruction wasn’t limited to just South Carolina; it also devastated Guadeloupe, St. Croix, and Puerto Rico, and produced hurricane force winds across portions of North Carolina. The Ben Sawyer Bridge connecting Mount Pleasant and Sullivan’s Island, which normally turned from side-to-side to allow the passing of ships, broke from its cables. There was a massive amount of other bridge and roadway damage.

Subsurface Utility Engineering - FHWA

At the time of this event, Paul was working in the FHWA’s Office of Engineering in its Railroads, Utilities, and Programs Branch. Jim Carney, a much-beloved gentleman who used to walk around the office in his sock feet, had just retired and his assistant, Jim Overton, was in charge of the office.

Three other positions in the office were vacant due to laterals or promotions: the secretary, the emergency relief engineer, and the special programs engineer (the special programs were pork barrel projects, many of which were ignored by the DOTs depending on politics in the state). That left Jim Overton in charge, Bob Winans to handle railroads and utilities, and Paul.

Paul’s job at the time was to keep up with Federal-aid regulations, policies, and eligibility pertaining to the more than 100 Federal-aid funding programs in effect. Thus, when the hurricane hit, the office had no one in place to handle emergency relief, which became even more of a problem when the Master of Disaster (i.e., the Secretary of Transportation) went to the Carolinas and promised them everything, whether in compliance with Federal laws and regulations or not.

He got lots of great publicity and actually did a very good job, but it fell to the emergency relief office to find ways to make it all happen. But, as mentioned, the emergency relief office was vacant.

As such, it fell to Jim Overton, the Acting Chief for the Railroads, Utilities, and Programs Branch, to (a) respond to numerous inquiries; (b) review requests for Emergency Relief funding; (c) prepare letters approving or denying the requests; and (d) much more. Paul helped Jim as best as he could, but his greatest value to Jim was filling in for the secretary. Paul was the only one in the office who knew how to type and use the new typewriter with word processing capabilities and there were lots of memorandums and letters that needed to go out.

They were getting overwhelmed. Fortunately, help was on the way.

The Arrival of Jerry Poston

Jerry Poston arrived to take over as Branch Chief. He immediately jumped in to help Jim and to direct the team. Consequently, they got the job done in a timely manner and Jerry recommended Jim and Paul for an award.

Jerry was always very quiet and unassuming with a ready smile and a twinkle in his eye, and he had more than his fair share of what the Army called “command presence.” He would sit in his office most of the day smoking cigarettes and working on various things, but his office door was always open if any ‘worker bees’ with cubbyholes in the big outer room needed help. He would always stop what he was doing, turn away from his work, and give them his full attention. Jim Overton was like that too.

Jerry soon filled the vacant positions and hired a cracker-jack secretary named Cleo Dorsey. Cleo told Paul with a mischievous smile that he was never to touch her typewriter again, so he reluctantly went back to his old job. The experience gave Paul a greater appreciation for the work that Cleo and other secretaries have to do.

A New Focus on Utilities

Jerry Poston, Jim Overton, and Paul had become a close team while working on the emergency relief. About a year later Jerry came to Paul’s cubbyhole one day and told him he had decided to split the railroad and utilities job into two full-time positions and wanted Bob Winans to keep the railroad position and Paul to take the utilities position.

Paul hesitated to do so but Jerry convinced him that it was a great opportunity. Not long after that, early in 1991, Jerry and Jim came to Paul and told him they had something they wanted him to do concerning a new practice being used by the Virginia DOT called Subsurface Utility Engineering.

FHWA's Endorsement of SUE

The FHWA's involvement would become one of the defining moments in the growth of Subsurface Utility Engineering.

At the time, SUE had already demonstrated measurable value through projects such as the Virginia Department of Transportation's Crystal City initiative and other early applications across the region.

The practice had developed terminology, methodologies, quality controls, professional oversight, and documented project savings. Jim Anspach later reflected that FHWA's involvement during the 1990s was one of the major reasons SUE evolved into what it is today.

Subsurface Utility Engineering FHWA

The practice continued moving from an innovative concept developed by a small group of industry pioneers toward a recognized engineering discipline used on infrastructure projects of all sizes.

The Beginning of a New Chapter for SUE

The events surrounding Hurricane Hugo, the arrival of Jerry Poston, and FHWA's growing interest in utility-related issues were not originally connected to Subsurface Utility Engineering. They eventually became part of the story.

The naming of SUE in 1989 gave the practice an identity. FHWA's endorsement in 1991 provided national exposure. Together, those developments helped accelerate adoption across transportation agencies and project owners seeking better ways to manage underground utility risk.

The industry that exists today, with thousands of companies and professionals supporting utility investigation, mapping, coordination, and risk management, can trace part of its growth back to these formative years and the individuals who recognized the value of doing things differently.

How can we help?

With decades of experience helping to mitigate risk across a wide range of industries, 4Sight Utility Engineers are the perfect partners to keep your project moving forward with confidence.

Posted in NPC
introducing-alexander-thier

Our field team continues to grow with Alex Thier recently joining us as a Junior SUE Field Technician. Alex brings enthusiasm, a customer-first mindset, and a strong desire to learn and grow in the utility engineering industry. He’s already off to a strong start, getting hands-on experience in the field and supporting utility investigations.
We're excited to be part of Alex's professional journey and look forward to seeing all he accomplishes as he develops his skills and experience with our team.